The first book by Lois McMaster Bujold is still my favorite from this expert storyteller. It’s as gripping now as when I first read it in the 80’s, and the conflicts it explores are still achingly relevant.
The story begins like a predictable romance. Cordelia Naismith, the commander of an environmental survey expedition, is taken prisoner by Aral Vorkosigan, an enemy captain from Barrayar. The Barrayarans have secretly claimed the unmapped planet of Sergyar as a base for their expansionist war, and they wipe out Cordelia’s camp. But there’s a wrinkle in Vorkosigan’s plans: his own men have mutinied, and his position is as precarious as Cordelia’s. In order to reach a hidden supply cache and survive, they need to cooperate.
Yet there’s much more to this novel than romance. It addresses moral questions about the treatment of prisoners and wounded. While most of Cordelia’s crew have escaped, her last surviving colleague, Ensign Dubauer, has been mentally disabled by a nerve disruptor. Vorkosigan suggests a mercy killing, but Cordelia offers her parole in exchange for bringing the wounded Dubauer on their 200-kilometer trek.
Bujold sets up a conflict of cultures and worldviews. On the wealthy, egalitarian and urban planet of Beta, poverty has been abolished, variable gender identity is taken for granted, and the lives of disabled people are valued. On Barrayar, a planet with a military aristocracy, a large rural population, and a fairly recent history of technological advances, traditional gender and sex roles are entrenched, babies with disabilities are routinely killed, and toxic masculinity reigns. (Bujold describes the practice of infanticide on Barrayar in a later short story, “The Mountains of Mourning.”)
Shards of Honor explores the interior and exterior aspects of honor, and how personal honor may conflict with service. In Vorkosigan’s military caste, the “Vor” accept each other’s word of honor without question, since violation would mean an unbearable public loss of face. For Vorkosigan himself, honor is also about maintaining his self-respect regardless of external appearances. Yet the administration of a warlike empire and the ruthless politics of Barrayar’s imperial court ravage his sense of integrity. Meanwhile, Cordelia introduces Aral Vorkosigan to her own brand of honor, which has to do with protecting the vulnerable and innocent.
Now, as to that romance… Aral Vorkosigan happens to have certain qualities in common with Edward Rochester (of Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre):
- Dark, unhandsome, stocky and muscular, of medium height: CHECK.
- Tortured past with a beautiful young wife who turned out to be unfaithful: CHECK
- Falls in love with Cordelia almost at first sight but doesn’t reveal it till much later: CHECK
- Despite his aristocratic background, recognizes Cordelia as his equal: CHECK
- Agonizes over seemingly insurmountable obstacle to their marital union: CHECK
- Is rescued by Cordelia from a life-threatening situation: CHECK
Of course, there are big differences; this is no Jane Eyre retelling. Cordelia is the same height as Vorkosigan, not tiny like Jane. She’s an astrocartographer and navigator. And trained in military ops. Vorkosigan, meanwhile, lacks Rochester’s arrogance and is not as insecure. Think of a saturnine nineteenth-century Russian Grand Duke, with a sense of humor and a scar on the side of his chin. In space.
The sequel, Barrayar, delivers action and suspense so continuously that you can barely catch your breath between the crises. Not much time for romantic dalliance between the lovers, but plenty of drama and intrigue. There is also the birth of Aral and Cordelia’s extraordinary son, Miles, who becomes the main character in the later books. This is space opera at its best.
Happy Thanksgiving, Linnet!
Thank you Stephen, and a very happy holiday to you!
Never heard of this before but I am intrigued! I will look into this, thanks for the tip. 🙂
Oh, and happy thanksgiving from me too.
Thanks Esther for the compliment and the holiday wishes. Bujold’s books are fun to read, especially the ones that focus more on anthropology, diplomacy and comedy of manners than on military aspects. “Captain Vorpatril’s Alliance” and “Cetaganda” are both interesting that way, and there is an almost Jane Austen feel to the calculations about marriage among the Barrayaran aristocrats!
Thanks for this review! I used to read a fair amount of science fiction and fantasy but wasn’t familiar with this author. I’ll have to look for this series.
I think you’d enjoy it, Karen. She has a sense of humor which is lacking in much sf of this type. And there are some fun romantic moments, which I always appreciate. I’m re-reading the whole series and appreciating her emphasis on ethical questions. For example, there is a short story involving an animal/human genetic hybrid and how this individual is treated. (May not be fiction for much longer, given the CRISPR technology.) Really interesting stuff, though it remains at the genre level and doesn’t get into deeper philosophical exploration.
your description of two planets, one in which (Beta) humankind in general is pretty egalitarian — whereas Barrayar’s modus-operandi is pretty much like a lot of Earth at present. so, should you have room in your sci-fi-reading queue, consider Ada Palmer’s trilogy which starts with “TOO LIKE THE LIGHTNING” — about 400-some years from now, with little-or-no bias about any kind of sexuality (everyone is “they” — NO “he” nor “she”), religion is pretty much banned due to the CHURCH WARS (happening on our planet in a century-to-come-soon), and NO NATIONS (most everyone identifies with some “Hive”). and THAT is not necessarily what the books are about (I’ve read 2 of three … waiting for #3’s price to come down) — there’s a bunch of intertwined poopoo gwan.
hoo-bah! if I live/livid a long/long time, these books will go into my queue — thanks 4 your wreckomendayshun !
Thanks for the comment and the tip, Bet! I am always looking for interesting new reading material. As to the CHURCH WARS….ugh.
well, when I started book #1 the discussion of “mankind in general” seemed … so, well, inevitable when one considers the problems/vagaries/assumptions/biases of today.
I don’t know where mankind in general is headed, but I’m not sure I would want to be here 100 years from now. That said, I would definitely like to be around for the end of Donald Trump’s presidency…
hopefully any month now …