Tags
If semi-autobiographical confessions with explicit sexual content are no longer shocking, it is in large part thanks to Philip Roth and Erica Jong. But where Roth’s Portnoy’s Complaint seems like old news, Jong’s Fear of Flying retains an electrifying jolt because her authorial voice, even forty years later, is so confident and emphatic about female desire–HER desire. It saddens me that critics still have to ask whether this hilarious, rebellious, brilliant work “deserves to be treated as great literature.” WTF? I don’t say that every woman should read this book. I say that every man should read it.

Erica Jong in 1973, drop-dead gorgeous, whip-smart, and horny as hell. Men must have found her rather threatening. Click for source (Masodomani).
Spoilers below.
Isadora Wing, the narrator of Fear of Flying, is a woman in her late twenties, navigating the feminist and sexual revolution circa 1970. For the first time, women have a chance to claim sexual freedom for themselves, the kind of freedom men have always enjoyed.
Isadora has a raging libido, and she fearlessly uses a man’s sexual vocabulary in a way not seen again until Samantha in Sex and the City: Prick. Balls. Cunt. Fuck. In keeping with the cultural shift of the 1970’s, most of the characters place sexual freedom above marital fidelity. People are experimenting with “open marriages.” Everything is questioned: the value of monogamy, the value of motherhood, woman’s place in society. In 1970 there are no female Supreme Court justices, no female CEO’s of big companies, no female astronauts. A female President of the United States is unthinkable. It is a world where brilliant, college-educated young women like Isadora are given a choice of three careers: secretary, teacher, nurse.
Like Portnoy’s Complaint, the book locates, limits, and dates itself by the prominence it gives to psychoanalysis. Everyone in New York in the 1960s and 70s, it seems, was on the couch. The male psychoanalysts around Isadora assume that all female problems are caused by penis envy or a daddy-wish or both. But they’re way off base.
Roth uses the couch as a device to permit Portnoy to talk dirty, revealing his obsessively horny inner monologue. Jong needs no such device for Isadora to do the same. Fear of Flying opens with Isadora sitting on a plane full of analysts en route to Vienna. One of them is her husband Bennett Wing, a morose, emotionally withdrawn man who nevertheless loves her (and is good in bed).
But Isadora gets the seven year itch two years early. She’s ready to become infatuated with the first sexy Englishman who grabs her ass and playfully calls her a cunt.
That scene caught me off guard. “Cunt” is a good old Anglo-Saxon four-letter word, but it’s mostly used by men in a demeaning way, as a more obscene and hostile alternative to “bitch.” For me, this fact renders the word a turnoff. But Isadora Wing’s sexuality is not politically correct. She gets excited when a man becomes erotically dominant. As she says, quoting Sylvia Plath, “Every woman adores a fascist.” And yet, only if he’s the right fascist at the right moment. The book illustrates a great truism of female sexuality, one which is often misunderstood by men. The famous “zipless fuck,” for example, is Isadora’s fantasy of a perfect sexual encounter, one with no impediments (even clothes magically fall away), no guilt, no strings. An uncivilized stranger on a train, an exploring masculine hand touching a female thigh just above the stocking, a long, dark tunnel (psychoanalysis again).
But to balance this picture, Jong adds a scene later in the book where Isadora is nearly raped by a porter on a train. The zipless fantasy doesn’t work –in fact it goes horribly wrong– unless it’s the right man. Compare Alexander Portnoy, who had a habit of accosting women in the streets of New York and asking if they’d like to go home with him. He really didn’t give a damn who they were, as long as they had a cunt.
That’s the crucial difference between the two books. Portnoy desperately needs the female body, but he not-so-secretly despises women. Isadora Wing has an equally compelling need for sex, but she loves and appreciates men in all their grunting, farting glory. She finds something attractive, sympathetic, even noble in every lover, even when she’s well aware that he is all too human.
Both books are about being Jewish, but Portnoy’s Complaint often feels like little more than a rant (if a clever and amusingly written one) against the domineering, overprotective, guilt-tripping, smothering, demanding personalities of his parents, especially his mother. Roth/Portnoy’s inability to settle down, his selfishness, his narcissism, his contempt for women and his aching, monstrous need for them–all are put down to his Oedipal desire for, and consequent hatred of, his mother and his Jewishness (which become one and the same thing). In Fear of Flying, this aspect of family life is portrayed with a lighter and defter hand:
Isadora’s Jewishness shapes her personality and her ideas in sometimes negative ways, resulting, for example, in fear-born prejudices against Germans and Arabs. The confessional genre rises to the level of art in part because of its authors’ fearlessness in scrutinizing and revealing the least flattering aspects of themselves. Isadora also reveals, from time to time, her contempt for uneducated people and a blithe sense of entitlement, a lack of empathy hinting at the silver spoon. But these themes never take over the story or spoil its pleasures.
The greatest irony of the book is that Adrian Goodlove (yes, Goodlove), the sandy-haired Englishman who lures Isadora away from her husband, turns out to be impotent most of the time. (And has dirty toenails, ugh.) It doesn’t matter, because Isadora is in love with him. She has to face the fact that for whatever reason (nature? nurture? culture?) her greatest need is not perpetual sexual novelty, but the intimacy and security of being in a committed relationship. No, she rages, why can’t I have both? As one of the first women to taste true sexual freedom, Isadora faces an age-old conundrum that men have always known. And what have the male solutions to this problem been?
A. Subjugate women in harems, polygamous marriages, etc. so that men can enjoy both intimacy and novelty.
B. Define “marriage” as sexual freedom for the man and sexual fidelity for the woman.
B. Cheat.
Women have rarely (if ever) had a chance to exercise Options A or B. Option C is risky and ethically out-of-bounds. Until Vienna, Isadora never cheats on Bennett even though she is sorely tempted. Finally, however, she allows him to see that she’s canoodling with Adrian, and she shuttles back and forth between the two men for a few bizarre days, sleeping with both of them and trying to make a choice. She wonders why Bennett doesn’t run out and deck Adrian, why he doesn’t fight for what is his. Why, that is, doesn’t Bennett claim her as a possession and strip her of her newly-won freedom?
Bennett assumes it is her right to go. He treats Isadora as an equal. It’s not as romantic, not as gendered, not as sexy as if he had flattened Adrian with a knockout punch, then thrown Isadora over his shoulder and carried her squealing back to his cave. But that’s what real freedom and equality looks like.
Ultimately, Isadora’s “fear of flying” is the fear of being alone, being her own person rather than one half of a couple. Men have always (at least potentially) had to face the loneliness of this, but at least the culture respected them as men. A woman with no husband and no children was assumed to be nothing and nobody, a pitiful, contemptible thing. In the end, Isadora is forced to face her worst fear when Adrian the Bastard dumps her to go back to his wife, leaving her to navigate her own life as best she can, alone in Paris with a suitcase full of dirty clothes and no Tampax. She gradually makes her way back to Bennett’s hotel room in London, where she blissfully submerges herself in his bathtub, washing away the literal and metaphorical grime of her adventure in freedom. She doesn’t know whether she wants Bennett back, and she doesn’t know whether he will take her back. The one thing she does know, finally and with certainty, is that she’s a person, a woman, who can stand on her own two feet and fly.
Essay copyright by Linnet Moss 2015
What a great review of this seminal novel, Linnet. I read it when I was in my early to mid-twenties, and I don’t think I appreciated the book for the message it conveys. I was too preoccupied with the forbidden-ness of the sexual contents of it (yes, even in the 1990s I felt there was still some sort of stigma attached to the graphic depiction of sexuality in literature.) Time to re-read!
As for the last paragraph – “A woman with no husband and no children was assumed to be nothing and nobody, a pitiful, contemptible thing.” That hits home and leaves me with goose-pimples. Because I suspect that fight has not been won. I think women are still defined by their marital (or at least “relationship”) status and by their ability/decision to have children or not. I have no idea where we have to go or what we have to do to reach equality in that respect, too.
Agreed, Guylty. I fear that women are still judged by these standards, and by arbitrary standards of physical appearance. I’ll never forget going to Greece for the first time, and the first question a Greek person asked me (our taxi driver!) was “How many children do you have?” Greek culture happens to be fairly conservative on that issue, but such attitudes are very much alive and well on my home ground, too.
As for sexuality in literature–well, you know by now that I’m in favor 🙂 I think it’s interesting how different treatments cause visceral reactions (positive or negative) in people… like the way Jong uses “cunt” in her novel.
As a non-native speaker of English, the word ‘cunt’ does not really affect me as it would you, I am sure. But I have a similar reaction to the German equivalent, so I can sort of understand. Hence I used to avoid it – until I read “The Vagina Monologues” and decided to follow their call and reclaim the word. I hate the way that word is used as a swear word, when it really describes nothing but a body part. And a body part, that a large number of men quite enjoy, to say the least. How weird, that it has become a, if not ‘the’ swear word…
As for the question for children – I cringe every time it is asked. It seems like such a personal question, after all, some people may not be childless by choice. Now, I do have children (although rather *not* by choice *haha* – they happened 😉 ) but depending who is asking the question, I have fun with the answer and reply with a fantastical number such as “I have seven children, among them two sets of twins.” and then spin a full yarn. Serves them right to be ribbed!
LOL. Good for you. I remember once being asked by my boss whether I was going to have children. I replied evasively, saying I didn’t think it was “in the cards.” He assumed I was infertile and suggested that we consider adopting!
The question, “How many children do you have?” sounds thoughtless on two levels. What if you did want children but couldn’t have them? Ouch. And then there’s of course the assumption that you want children.
I’m with you on not wanting children. Never have. I wonder if it has something to do with being a writer…and now that I have a dog I can say for sure that Geordie is enough responsibility for me.
I’ve been told that I’ll change my mind later. (I’ve been saying this since my twenties.) Still no change of heart. Did you ever change your mind?
I never wanted them, and kept thinking that my “biological clock” would go off when I hit thirty-five, when I got tenure, etc., etc. It never did. Now I am 50 and I have no regrets. Yes, there is a certain feeling of being an outsider when other people discuss their kids, and the knowledge that I have not experienced certain things that other people find very fulfilling. But I honestly don’t miss it. And I have no regrets.
It’s awesome to hear you say that. People keep telling me I’ll change my mind when I get older, and I really can’t argue against that. But what should I do then? Have kids now just in case I want them later? No thanks. 🙂
Right. I just didn’t see how I could become a mother when I had absolutely no desire for it. It didn’t seem right. My mom said, “once they come you’ll fall in love with them” and maybe the hormones would kick in. But I wasn’t going to take any chances on that. To be honest, I’m just not interested in babies or children until they reach the age of reason–Thirty! I like pictures of cute kids, but the minute they start screaming, I’m done.
I’m so with you on that. I don’t even care to see photos of them. Certainly not babies…they look kind of creepy to me. 🙂
LOL. I’m OK with babies– in small doses. And preferably not on airplanes or in restaurants. But even as a kid, I had no interest in dolls. Only stuffed animals 🙂 And I hated the idea of being pregnant. It seemed like a loss of bodily integrity. Plus, you can’t drink…
And to think that pregnancy is just the beginning! That seems weird enough for me. Like invasion of the body snatchers…
I often think how lucky I was to be born in a period of history and in a place where I had the ability to make that choice for myself. For most of human history, biology was destiny.
True story. We are lucky indeed!
you may want want a ‘comment’, but none here. too-@-1-time close, too personal. “Betty” has read (practically EVERYTHING) those two books, and Jewish be-sigheds, so I feel I’ve lived thru’ a lot of Portnoy and “Fear” ~
i will probably never recover ! : }
LOL. I wish you healing 🙂 Both books are very, very funny and that’s why I love them.
I do think ‘dickhead’ works. A cock is a mindless, silly, wobbly thing, that frequently disgraces it’s self. We all know men who think with their bits, it describes well the dumbness of male actions. But cunt isn’t like that, it’s all neatly tucked away, and is very discerning. It doesn’t spring randomly to attention with little or no encouragement. I can’t really think of any negative connotations, it only works that way if you see women as distasteful.
My daughter and her partner have chosen not to have children, I think for their generation it’s an accepted option. In my day, noooo! If you got to 25 didn’t have a husband and kids, you were virtually considered a witch!
Loved the review, one of my favourite books, I just wish I’d read it when I was 19, and not 40!
Thank you very much for this comment! I love what you had to say about cunt vs. cock, LOL. You are quite eloquent on the subject 🙂 Yes, there is nothing wrong with the word “cunt”–what bothers me is how it is used, almost always by men, as a pejorative obscenity. It would be great to take the word back, as Guylty says was done in “The Vagina Monologues.” That’s one I’ve not seen, shame on me! Next on the reading list.
I meant to say I totally agree with Guylty, the word is ours, we own it.
That book was on Mums bookshelf but I never actually read it. Just knew it signified something in her ‘pushing back against the status quo’ and was another small piece in the start of her questioning her life and marriage. May have to go find me a copy. My sisters and friends have often discussed what I call taking ‘taking the word ‘cunt’ back’. As in, taking away the obscenity of it and getting back to what it really is, a beautiful part of a woman. Such a verboten word and I don’t think that view will change in my lifetime.
I echo what others have said in wishing I had read this book when I was younger. My mother didn’t have it on the shelf!
I read Fear of Flying a long time ago but really need to revisit it I think! Great review 🙂
Thanks! It’s worth a read. Now I’m going to try the sequel, “Fear of Dying.” Not quite as good a title!
But also realistic 🙂
Yes. But it’s supposed to be a comic novel!!