This week’s chapter contains a hint about the mysterious past of Jonathan Sebelius. We learn something about Jennet’s background too. As a foil to Jonathan’s misogynist tendencies, I made her a forthright feminist, though a freethinking one.
6. Thy Dear And Only Son
Jennet arrived home to find Kyle waiting for her in the kitchen. “Joel went to Switzerland on business, so I thought I’d come hang out with you this weekend,” he said. Kyle’s partner, Joel Cantor, worked for Citibank in New York and often traveled to the Swiss branch. “I made a frittata with chard, Italian sausage and feta,” he added. “Want some?”
“That sounds delicious, but I had a late meeting and then ate at Revels. Save me a slice for breakfast, though.” Kyle was a great cook. She gazed at him fondly, proud as always of what a handsome son she had produced. He was like his father: tall, solidly built, and capable of eating the entire frittata at one sitting— and then moving on to the other contents of the refrigerator. As a young boy, on the other hand, Kyle had been rather delicate. He was sure of his sexual orientation even before he hit puberty, and he’d had some difficult years at school because he chose to be open about it almost from the start. He was gregarious and funny, and those qualities together with his good looks won over most people. Still, he’d come home more than a few times with bruises and bloody noses. Whenever she swore furiously that she was going to call the principal, hound the parents of the bullies, sue the school, he’d said firmly, “No, Mom. I want to handle it on my own. I’ll let you know if it gets to be too much.”
Kyle had inherited her own instinct for political action, but he was far better than she at persuading people to his point of view. He’d started a Gay-Straight Alliance at his high school, much to the dismay of certain parents, and was active in student government all the way through college. Kyle said that Jennet inspired him. It was the greatest compliment she’d ever received. For years now, she had volunteered at Planned Parenthood and devoted much of her spare time to feminist causes, mostly to do with reproductive freedom in the U.S. and developing countries.
When he was younger, Kyle hadn’t at first understood her passionate support for girls’ and women’s access to contraception and abortion. “Mom,” he’d finally said, “Do you wish you didn’t have a baby? That… that you didn’t have me?”
“Kyle honey, I think every day about how glad I am that I have you. But I had a choice. Grandma and Grandpa helped me financially, and they let me choose. All over the world there are girls and women who don’t get to choose. Someone else makes decisions about their bodies, and it’s not right.” He was too young to be told that his grandmother, raped by a cousin during a Christmas holiday, had sought an illegal abortion and nearly died from it. Convinced that reproductive rights were nothing less than essential human rights, Jennet’s mother Gertrude had been a pioneering feminist in the seventies, and her daughter shared the same ideals.
Kyle was putting away his frittata with gusto as they sat at the kitchen table. “So, Mom,” he said slyly, pouring her a glass of Pinot Grigio, “Were you eating with someone at Revels? On a Friday evening?”
“Yes, a colleague from work. A particularly frustrating one.”
“A male colleague?” he coaxed.
“Yes, and I have to admit he’s attractive. Unfortunately, he’s famous all over campus for hating women.”
Kyle cut himself another generous slice of frittata. “Do you think he hates you?”
She considered this. “No… No, he doesn’t. But I’m not sure he likes me, either. He stares at me half the time, and the other half, he acts like I have leprosy.”
Her son chuckled. “He doesn’t hate you. Just don’t spook him. Be patient.” He scrutinized his mother critically. “And get a haircut.”
“Jonathan,” said Stefan Sebelius, with the special note of pleasure in his voice that he reserved for his son alone.
“Hi Dad,” said Jonathan. “I brought you a couple of weeks of the Sunday New York Times, some issues of The Progressive, and Ken Follett’s Pillars of the Earth. I think this is the one you asked for. Sorry I didn’t make it last week.”
“Sit down and tell me what’s been happening at work,” said Stefan. He knew that work was Jonathan’s whole life now, aside from fencing and his beloved book collection. “How goes the battle between Literature and Rhetoric?”
He was talking about the two competing graduate programs in English. One, encompassing the traditional M.A. and Ph.D. in English Literature, was Sebelius’ bailiwick, and the other was a trendier program in “Literacy and Rhetoric,” which viewed all texts as equally worthy of study. Jonathan, his father knew, thought Literacy and Rhetoric was a worthless waste of time. Why would anyone devote hours of contemplation to ephemeral television scripts, advertising copy, or city council minutes, when there were texts of real merit to be pondered, written about, and shared with students? Shakespeare. Milton. Chaucer. Spenser. Donne. Unfortunately, the Literacy and Rhetoric program was starting to attract more graduate students than Literature did, and Jonathan was locked in a constant battle for resources with his nemesis and counterpart, Bill Jenko, who coordinated the other program.
“My colleague Laura Livingston voted in favor of Gerhard Dahl getting tenure, and hers was the deciding vote at the department level,” reported Jonathan. “If it goes through the college, we’ll have more tenured Rhetoric faculty in the department than Literature faculty, and it’s only going to get worse.” Damn Livingston! Why in hell did she have to vote for Dahl? He had seriously reconsidered his friendship with her after she’d broken the news that, as far as she was concerned, Dahl met all the departmental requirements. At least she didn’t go behind my back. He respected Livingston, his only female friend, for her knowledge of seventeenth-century books. But she was far too naïve when it came to departmental politics.
“They’ve already ditched the requirement that all majors take Shakespeare and Chaucer,” he continued. “Pretty soon we’ll be offering courses about how to analyze grocery store receipts and the copy on cereal boxes.” His father shook his head, looking tired and worried. Jonathan immediately regretted his venting. “But I do have some good news to report. The new Classics professor has expertise in papyrology and has agreed to look at the document Farfar left me.” Farfar was Swedish for Grandpa, and it was the name they always used for Stefan’s father.
“Oh? Who is he?”
“Actually,” said Jonathan reluctantly, “it’s a she.”
Stefan was too clever to reveal his reaction to this interesting news, but he cunningly asked, “And where did she go to school?” He was very proud of the fact that Jonathan had been educated at Duke University, which was first-rate in English Literature and had an NCAA Division I fencing team, and that his Ph.D. was from Yale.
“Michigan, I think,” said Jonathan, and when his father snorted, he said, “They have a well-known program in papyrology. I’m sure she has real expertise. She’s certainly published a lot.” It felt odd to be defending the Woman to his father.
“You haven’t shown it to her yet?” asked Stefan. He was scrutinizing Jonathan’s face, and he recognized emotion there. Something about this woman had affected him deeply.
“No, I only asked her to look at it on Friday.”
“Hmm. Well. She’s doing you quite a favor. You should do something for her in return.”
Jonathan looked at him suspiciously. “Such as?” He half expected his father to say he should ask the Woman to dinner. For years now, Dad had been dropping little comments about how he needed to find a female companion. Jonathan always ignored these remarks, and he thought Stefan had finally given up on that topic.
The old man raised his brown eyes to Jonathan’s light blue ones. “How should I know?” he said irascibly. “You’re the one with the Ph.D. Think of something.”
After Jonathan left, his father spent a long time looking out the window, contemplating the unknown woman.
Copyright 2015 by Linnet Moss
Notes: Jennet has a little bit of me in her, but she’s based on someone I knew in graduate school, a woman who had a baby when she was very young herself, then went on to earn a Ph.D. in Classics as a single mom. Her son was named Kyle. As for Stefan, he’s my favorite secondary character in all my stories, a dark-eyed Swede (they exist!). He represents that hardy, commonsense Scandinavian stock who migrated to the Midwestern plains of the US in the nineteenth and early twentieth century. They produced a special breed of men–including the Long Suffering Husband.
Update: I added screen caps from The Eclipse to Chapter 5, illustrating the source for Jonathan’s fantasy. To see them, click on the link and scroll down to the end.
It is always the little details that make a fiction stand out. In this particular chapter it was the minute detail of calling the grandfather “farfar”. Just one word, in passing, about a character that doesn’t even feature properly – but it says a lot about the whole family…
Talking of family – nice to see both Jennet and Jonathan together with their loved ones. Again an opportunity to learn about them. How Jennet has brought up Kyle is an indication of her character – strong, independent, politically aware, tolerant woman. Similarly with Jonathan – the fact that he has a relationship with his father, sheds light on his personality. Nice.
Oh, and I like how you sneaked in the opportunity to highlight femen and the feminist movement. Cannot be mentioned enough. Still valid and still needed – a realization that was brought back to me last week when I read that article about Hobbitcon which belittled the attendance of (young) women at such events.
Thanks for these great comments. “Farfar” is something that comes from the Swedish-Americans in my own family. And “Morfar” is the maternal grandfather. They have quite an extensive terminology for family members!
Femen is a bit in-your-face for some folks, but I admire them very much 🙂
I just really like that concept – identifying the grandparents as per their relation to one’s own parents. Mormor, farmor, farfar, morfar. More efficient than having to place a name behind the ubiquitous “grandpa” and “granny”.
In your face alright, re. femen. But then again, nowadays we need as much spectacle as back in the days of the suffragettes. My husband’s greatgrandmother (farfarmor?) was an Irish suffragette and went to prison for women’s rights. Her most spectacular stunt was smashing a window of Dublin’s Customs House in front of a policeman. Much to her chagrin he chose to ignore her statement – as she was an elegant, obviously middle-class woman. He shirked the trouble an arrest of a middle-class woman would be. And she was frustrated at being treated differently, again…
What a great story! And an inspiring one. What finally put her in prison, then?
It was actually that incident. She forced him to acknowledge what she had done. You can read more about her – and the consequences of the incident – here: https://books.google.ie/books?id=wyPVAwAAQBAJ&pg=PT22&lpg=PT22&dq=mabel+purser+suffragette&source=bl&ots=Ig8dwH2RaC&sig=k9C-IHkxzrMEFmROgfnr6Nb6NMo&hl=de&sa=X&ei=-g8tVebDGc_napW9gdAI&ved=0CDUQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=mabel%20purser%20suffragette&f=false
Wow–very cool stuff, and such an important chapter of history. It’s easy for us today to take for granted the rights we have, which we owe to the courage of women like her. And of course there is much work still to be done around the world.
You know, I had recently been laughing a bit about the frequent “feminist” reblogs on tumblr by young women. How utterly ignorant of me. Mabel would be spinning in her grave. It’s still needed, and we should never be complacent about having attained the right to vote when so many things are still not equal for women.
I agree 100%. There are too many young women these days who say “I’m not a feminist, but…” which is exactly the wrong attitude. It takes for granted all the work done by our foremothers. None of those rights were given to us. Someone had to demand them. And most of the world’s population still lives under heavily patriarchal conditions.
Sorry to be clogging your comment section – I just found the newspaper article from 1913 that mentions her despicable actions: https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2249&dat=19130131&id=HqY-AAAAIBAJ&sjid=llkMAAAAIBAJ&pg=3980,5396160&hl=de The Boston Evening “New Weapon for Women” – Taken to Court for Smashing Windows. Wow – first time that I am seeing this. I think I’ll print it out and give it to my daughter, her greatgreatgranddaughter.
Don’t you love Google? And to add to the interest, she was an ACTRESS? Quel scandale!
Google is great, indeed. I ended up with three articles that mentioned her, all from 1913, one from the Washington Post! I printed them and gave them to my kids. Alas, they were not as impressed as they should be. Maybe in time they will come to understand the importance of the suffragettes.
As for actress – no, that was another suffragette. Mabel was otherwise a good and proper middle-class wife and mother, as befitted her family background. (Mind you, she was sister-in-law to a very well-known painter, so there was a bit of bohemia in that family.)
Ah, yes, I remember the painter 🙂
Your kids will value this history more as they get older (both the painter and the suffragette). It’s really something to be proud of, and they’re fortunate that it is documented. Someone in your family should write a novel about them, like Sebastian Barry’s book about his grandmother!
A nice little look into the family life of these two as well as some of their deeper motivations, beliefs and feelings. Also, an interesting tidbit regarding the genetic background of the LSH and very cool to read of the chard in the frittata LM! Vegetable kismet.
That’s right about the chard!! We must be on the Silverbeet Wavelength 🙂
Sylvie G said:
I like the way you managed to introduce the intricacies of university life through a discussion at home. Kyle is a lovely character. 🙂
Thanks! I am very fond of Kyle too.
I thought i wanted/needed a bit of fluff today but this was actually exactly what i needed in the end. Had been looking forward to the next chapter and it’s brilliant, So much family history in few words and more gestures. I thought you captured both relationships so well and told us very interesting things about their back-stories. Love her commitments but also feel very drawn to the family sense in his family… Intriguing also how they seem to only relate on the male line..
Dark eyed Swedes,.. interesting! i assume actually just like pretty fair haired and ver blue eyed Spaniards , which i know 🙂 Human genetic mixology, always intriguing 🙂
On the academics stuff, sigh,…. the truth is always in the middle/balance :-))))
Many thanks! Yes, Stefan is a dark eyed Swede, but genetically speaking it’s unlikely that he could have a son with light blue eyes… not impossible mind you, but a hint.
it’s impressive (to me)how you’re somewhat “all over the place” with what and how and often and where you write!
Why thank you! The serialised stories were completed some time ago, so I can’t pretend that I churn out a chapter every week 🙂 But it does give me an opportunity to revise them and add comments.